|
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Compliance with Inhaled Insulin Treatment Using the AERx® iDMS Insulin Diabetes Management System
To cite this article:
J.A. Cramer, J. Okikawa, S. Bellaire, P. Clauson.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
December 2004,
6(6): 800-807.
doi:10.1089/dia.2004.6.800.
J.A. Cramer, B.S.Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. J. Okikawa, M.S.Aradigm, Hayward, California. S. Bellaire, M.S.Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark. P. Clauson, M.D., Ph.D.Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark. Objective: The AERx® Insulin Diabetes Management System [AERx iDMS, jointly developed by Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark) and Aradigm Corp. (Hayward, CA)] provides insulin by pulmonary administration. This investigation was designed as a pilot trial to demonstrate the ability of patients to use the electronic device to deliver mealtime inhaled insulin doses and explore the impact on compliance. Methods: AERx iDMS was evaluated in a substudy of a 12-week, multicenter open trial by adult patients with type 2 diabetes previously on any insulin regimen. The device was used for dosing fast-acting human insulin immediately before main meals, in combination with bedtime NPH insulin. The AERx iDMS device recorded the date and time of each insulin inhalation, insulin units used, and inhalation technique during aerosol delivery. Compliance was defined as the percentage of prescribed doses taken during the treatment period, dose timing, and the efficiency of dosing technique. Results: Insulin dosing for 49 patients (age 59.1 ± 7.7 years) using AERx iDMS was monitored for 78.9 ± 10 days (range, 41–94 days) with 226 ± 35 doses (range, 122–272 doses). Patients inhaled on average 2.9 ± 0.3 doses of insulin daily, taking an average of 11.8 ± 5.6 units per dose. Compliance with the prescribed regimen was 94.3 ± 9.1% (range, 45–100%). Overall, 4.2 ± 9.5% of prescribed doses were omitted. Hemoglobin A1c decreased 0.77 ± 0.96% from baseline to the end of the study. Inhalation technique was excellent, with 97% of patients experiencing fewer than five inadequate doses. Conclusions: Excellent compliance with AERx iDMS dosing, timing, and inhalation technique showed that the device was well accepted by patients. The electronic monitoring feature could be used as an educational tool to help patients and clinicians manage insulin dosing.  This paper was cited by:Safety and efficacy of inhaled insulin (AERx
®
iDMS) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes: 1-year data from a randomized, parallel group trial R. G. Moses, P. Bartley, H. Lunt, R. C. O’Brien, T. Donnelly, M.-A. Gall, A. Vesterager, P. Wollmer, A. Roberts Diabetic Medicine. Apr 2009, Vol. 26, No. 3: 260-267 CrossRef Inhaled insulin using AERx
®
insulin Diabetes Management System (AERx
®
iDMS) Sunder Mudaliar Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. Nov 2007, Vol. 16, No. 10: 1673-1681 CrossRef Peptide drug delivery strategies for the treatment of diabetes Negar Sadrzadeh, Michael J. Glembourtt, Cynthia L. Stevenson Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Sep 2007, Vol. 96, No. 8: 1925-1954 CrossRef Delivering Needle-Free Insulin Using AERx® iDMS (Insulin Diabetes Management System) Technology Per Wollmer, Thomas R. Pieber, Mari-Anne Gall, Stephen Brunton Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Jun 2007, Vol. 9, No. s1: S-57-S-64 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsNon-invasive routes for insulin administration: current state and perspectives Claudio González, Diego Kanevsky, Rubén De Marco, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Silvina Santoro Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. Dec 2006, Vol. 3, No. 6: 763-770 CrossRef Regimen and Device Compliance: Key Factors in Determining Therapeutic Outcomes Mark L. Everard Journal of Aerosol Medicine. Mar 2006, Vol. 19, No. 1: 67-73 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
|
|