|
Journal of Endourology
Complications of Pneumatic Ureterolithotripsy in the Early Postoperative Period
To cite this article:
I. Atilla Arido  an, Sinan Zeren, Yildirim Bayazit, Bülent Soyupak, Şaban Doran.
Journal of Endourology.
January/February 2005,
19(1): 50-53.
doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.50.
I. Atilla Arido  an, M.D.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey. Sinan Zeren, M.D.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey. Yildirim Bayazit, M.D.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey. Bülent Soyupak, M.D.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey. Şaban Doran, M.D.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey. Purpose: To document the perioperative and early postoperative complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy. Patients and Methods: Between January 1997 and December 2003, pneumatic ureterolithotripsy was performed in 665 male and 314 female patients for stones >0.5 cm. The age range was 9 months to 72 years (mean 41 years). Preoperatively, intravenous urography, urinalysis, and urine culture were done. Cefepime 1 g was given as prophylactic antimicrobial therapy 1 hour prior to surgery. A plain film of the urinary tract was taken immediately before the procedure. The operations were carried out with the patient under general anesthesia. Rigid ureteroscopes (6.9F ACMI "micro-6" or 8F–10F Storz) and the Vibrolith® (Elmed, Ankara, Turkey) pneumatic lithotripter were used. The fragments were extracted with forceps or baskets. Urinalysis and culture as a routine postoperative evaluation and a plain film or ultrasonogram of the urinary tract when needed were done 1 week after the procedure. Results: The stones were completely removed in 847 patients (86.5%); 783 (80%) of them went home on the day of surgery. A ureteral stent was needed in 401 patients (41.0%). Perioperative complications were migration of the stone into the kidney in 70 patients (7.2%), mucosal damage in 34 (3.5%), ureteral perforation in 17 (1.7%), ureteral avulsion in 4 (0.4%), and conversion to open surgery in 3 (0.2%). During the early postoperative period, flank pain (18.4%), pelvic discomfort (5.5%), macroscopic hematuria (7.3%), and urinary tract infection (5%) were recorded. Conclusion: Ureterolithotripsy by a pneumatic lithotripter is a minimally invasive, highly tolerable procedure with a low complication rate and short hospital stay when performed meticulously with appropriate instruments.  This paper was cited by:The Outcome of Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Ureterolithotomy for the Management of Upper Ureteral Stones Larger than 10 mm: A Comparison with Rigid Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones with Lithoclast® Woo Jin Park, Jun O Kwon, Tae Hee Oh Korean Journal of Urology. Feb 2009, Vol. 50, No. 4: 349 CrossRef Use of Free Peritoneal and Bladder Mucosal Grafts as Ureteral Mucosa Substitutes for Management of Avulsion of the Ureteral Mucosa in a Dog Model Jing Yifeng, Xia Shujie, Sun Hongbin, Xu Yaoting, Fan Jie, Tang Xiaoda Journal of Endourology. Apr 2008, Vol. 22, No. 4: 729-734 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsIs Routine Radiological Surveillance Mandatory After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopic Stone Removal? Mert Ali Karadag, Ahmet Tefekli, Fatih Altunrende, Abdulkadir Tepeler, Murat Baykal, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu Journal of Endourology. Feb 2008, Vol. 22, No. 2: 261-266 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsInitial clinical evaluation of a new pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripter Abhay Rané, Sashi S. Kommu, S.V. Kandaswamy, Pradeep Rao, Monish Aron, Rajeev Kumar, Narmada Gupta BJU International. Oct 2007, Vol. 100, No. 3: 629-632 CrossRef Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment? Lutfi Tunc, Bora Kupeli, Cagri Senocak, Turgut Alkibay, Sinan Sözen, Ustunol Karaoglan, Ibrahim Bozkirli International Urology and Nephrology. Sep 2007, Vol. 39, No. 3: 759-764 CrossRef Ureteral Access Sheath Use and Stenting in Ureteroscopy: Effect on Unplanned Emergency Room Visits and Cost Daniel Rapoport, Alexandra E. Perks, Joel M.H. Teichman Journal of Endourology. Sep 2007, Vol. 21, No. 9: 993-998 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsPrimary Ureteroscopy for Distal-Ureteral Stones Compared with Ureteroscopy after Failed Extracorporeal Lithotripsy Volkan Tugcu, Gokhan Gürbüz, Bekir Aras, Levent Gurkan, Alper Otunctemur, Ali Ihsan Tasci Journal of Endourology. Dec 2006, Vol. 20, No. 12: 1025-1029 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsEfficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy with Patients Rotated Supine or Rotated Prone for Treating Ureteral Stones: A Case-Control Study Noboru Hara, Hiroshi Koike, Vladimir Bilim, Kota Takahashi, Tsutomu Nishiyama Journal of Endourology. Mar 2006, Vol. 20, No. 3: 170-174 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsLiteratureWatch Journal of Endourology. Oct 2005, Vol. 19, No. 8: 1045-1062 First Page | Full Text PDF
|
|