|
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Participation of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women in Research in the United States
To cite this article:
Susan Brogly, Jennifer S. Read, David Shapiro, Alice Stek, Ruth Tuomala.
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses.
January 2007,
23(1): 51-53.
doi:10.1089/aid.2006.0045.
Susan Brogly Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-6017. Jennifer S. Read Pediatric, Adolescent and Maternal AIDS Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. David Shapiro Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-6017. Alice Stek University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles County Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90033. Ruth Tuomala Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. Previous studies suggested that some groups of HIV-infected women were underrepresented in studies of antiretrovirals (ARVs). We assessed rates of and reasons for nonenrollment in a U.S. prospective cohort study (protocol P1025), and differences in the characteristics of HIV-infected pregnant women who were and were not enrolled. Forty-one percent of women invited to participate were not enrolled. Clinic-related reasons for nonenrollment included staffing or site resources (26.7% of women) and clinician refusal because of the woman's nonadherence to prenatal care and/or poor research candidacy (10.8%). Patient-related reasons for nonenrollment included unavailability of women for enrollment (e.g., difficulty enrolling during labor/delivery, loss of clinic contact) (20.3%), refusal because of mistrust (10.1%), refusal because of time requirements (8.3%), refusal because of distance to the clinic (4.7%), and spontaneous abortion (4.7%). P1025 participants (N = 530) were significantly more likely to be Hispanic (32.1% vs. 19.8%), and less likely to be non-Hispanic black), to present in the first or second trimester for prenatal care (91.5% vs. 77.6%), and to be ARV-naive (32.8% vs. 23.0%) than nonparticipants (N = 2222). This high rate of nonenrollment can bias study results and generate findings that are applicable only to particular groups of women. Efforts should be taken to design protocols that facilitate enrollment of HIV-infected pregnant women.  This paper was cited by:Human Immunodeficiency Virus Diagnostic Testing of Infants at Clinical Sites in North America Jennifer S. Read, Susan Brogly, Michael Basar, Gwendolyn Scott The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. Aug 2009, Vol. 28, No. 7: 614-618 CrossRef Adherence to Antiretrovirals Among US Women During and After Pregnancy Arlene D Bardeguez, Jane C Lindsey, Maureen Shannon, Ruth E Tuomala, Susan E Cohn, Elizabeth Smith, Alice Stek, Shelly Buschur, Amanda Cotter, Linda Bettica, Jennifer S Read JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. Sep 2008, Vol. 48, No. 4: 408-417 CrossRef
|
|