|
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Program on HAART Adherence
To cite this article:
Pamela Frick, Kenneth Tapia, Philip Grant, Martina Novotny, Jane Kerzee.
AIDS Patient Care and STDs.
July 2006,
20(7): 511-524.
doi:10.1089/apc.2006.20.511.
Pamela Frick, Pharm.D., M.P.H.School of Pharmacy, Biostatistics Core, Seattle, Washington. Kenneth Tapia, M.S.University of Washington Center for AIDS Research, Biostatistics Core, Seattle, Washington. Philip Grant, M.D.School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Martina Novotny, Pharm.D.School of Pharmacy, Biostatistics Core, Seattle, Washington. Jane Kerzee, Pharm.D., B.C.P.S.Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado. Although emerging evidence suggests differing interventions may improve antiretroviral adherence, there has not been a formal evaluation to identify the impact of a clinic-based multidisciplinary program designed to provide education and identify and correct potential adherence barriers prior to the initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A retrospective cohort study utilizing a historical control group was conducted to compare duration on antiretrovirals, clinical indicators, and adherence rates, as captured by pharmacy refill records. Two hundred sixty-one patients met criteria for inclusion (109 subjects, 152 controls). Time to stopping antiretrovirals, as evidenced by Kaplan-Meier plot, was significantly higher in Protocol group than Controls (log-rank p = 0.023): the median duration on HAART for the intervention group was greater than 360 days but only 210 days for the control group. Thus, more subjects in the protocol group continued on therapy for the full year: 60 (55%) versus 65 (43%) for the control group. The mean reduction in log10 viral loads between HAART initiation and 12 months was greatest for the intervention group with viral load at HAART initiation 100,000 copies per milliliter or more, –3.57 versus –1.78 for controls with viral load less than 100,000 copies per milliliter (p < 0.001). For the intervention group, the mean number of adherence barriers identified per person was 4% and 72% were found to have three or more barriers. Patients at high risk for poor adherence benefit from multidisciplinary education and proactive identification of adherence barriers by exhibiting prolonged duration on therapy and greater reduction in log10 viral loads.  This paper was cited by:Attrition and related trends in scientific rigor: A score card for ART adherence intervention research and recommendations for future directions K. Rivet Amico, Jennifer J. Harman, Megan A. O’Grady Current HIV/AIDS Reports. Dec 2008, Vol. 5, No. 4: 172-185 CrossRef Association of Alcohol Abuse and Injection Drug Use with Immunologic and Virologic Responses to HAART in HIV-positive Patients from Urban Community Health Clinics Timothy J. Henrich, Naudia Lauder, Mayur M. Desai, Andre N. Sofair Journal of Community Health. May 2008, Vol. 33, No. 2: 69-77 CrossRef Social Support, Coping, and Medication Adherence Among HIV-Positive Women with Depression Living in Rural Areas of the Southeastern United States Medha Vyavaharkar, Linda Moneyham, Abbas Tavakoli, Kenneth D. Phillips, Carolyn Murdaugh, Kirby Jackson, Gene Meding AIDS Patient Care and STDs. Sep 2007, Vol. 21, No. 9: 667-680 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsThe Role of Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in the Management of HIV Infection Brian Conway JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. Jul 2007, Vol. 45, No. Supplement 1: S14-S18 CrossRef Outreach Program Contacts: Do They Increase the Likelihood of Engagement and Retention in HIV Primary Care for Hard-to-Reach Patients? Howard J. Cabral, Carol Tobias, Serena Rajabiun, Nancy Sohler, Chinazo Cunningham, Mitchell Wong, William Cunningham AIDS Patient Care and STDs. Jun 2007, Vol. 21, No. s1: S-59-S-67 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
|
|