|
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Once-Daily Multilayer-Release Methylphenidate in a Double-Blind, Crossover Comparison to Immediate-Release Methylphenidate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
To cite this article:
Margaret Weiss, Lily Hechtman, Atilla Turgay, Umesh Jain, Declan Quinn, Tahira S. Ahmed, Timothy Yates, Joseph L. Reiz, Graeme A.E. Donnelly, Zoltan Harsanyi, Andrew C. Darke.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.
November 2007,
17(5): 675-688.
doi:10.1089/cap.2006.0101.
Margaret Weiss, M.D.Children's & Women's Health Centre of BC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Lily Hechtman, M.D.The Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Atilla Turgay, M.D.The Scarborough Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Umesh Jain, M.D.Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Declan Quinn, M.D.Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Tahira S. Ahmed, M.D.ADD Clinic, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Timothy Yates, M.D.University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Joseph L. Reiz, B.Sc.Purdue Pharma, Pickering, Ontario, Canada. Graeme A.E. Donnelly, M.Sc.Purdue Pharma, Pickering, Ontario, Canada. Zoltan Harsanyi, B.Sc., M.L.S., M.B.A.Purdue Pharma, Pickering, Ontario, Canada. Andrew C. Darke, Ph.D.Purdue Pharma, Pickering, Ontario, Canada. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of a novel long-duration multilayer-release (MLR) methylphenidate (MPH) formulation and immediate-release (IR) MPH in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children. Patients and Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of once-daily MLR and twice-daily IR-MPH in home and school settings in children with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of ADHD. Patients completed a 1-week baseline followed by two active medication titration phases. Each phase of treatment was 1–4 weeks of titration with an additional stable dose week. The final dose was based on efficacy and adverse events for each patient. Efficacy measures included Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and Conners' Parent and Teacher Rating Scales (CPRS and CTRS). The Clinical Assessment of Side Effects (CASE) scale assessed frequency of adverse events. Results: Of the 90 enrolled patients, aged 6.4–17.5 years, 79 (88%) completed the study. Stable daily doses were 32.0 and 32.5 mg for MLR and IR-MPH, respectively. All efficacy parameters were significantly improved from baseline. A total of 73.2% and 81.0% of patients on MLR and IR-MPH were rated as “much” or “very much improved” on the CGI. A total of 77.4% and 81.1% of patients were normalized on the CPRS-R and 78.9 and 90.4% of patients were normalized on the CTRS-R for MLR and IR-MPH, respectively. The mean CASE score was not different from baseline for either treatment.  This paper was cited by:Evolution of stimulants to treat ADHD: transdermal methylphenidate Kennerly S. Patrick, Arthur B. Straughn, Jeb S. Perkins, Mario A. González Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental. Feb 2009, Vol. 24, No. 1: 1-17 CrossRef Cognitive and Behavioral Effects of Multilayer-Release Methylphenidate in the Treatment of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Russell Schachar, Abel Ickowicz, Jennifer Crosbie, Graeme A.E. Donnelly, Joseph L. Reiz, Paula C. Miceli, Zoltan Harsanyi, Andrew C. Darke Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. Feb 2008, Vol. 18, No. 1: 11-24 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
|
|