|
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Parents Report on Stimulant-Treated Children in the Netherlands: Initiation of Treatment and Follow-Up Care
To cite this article:
Adrianne Faber, Luuk J. Kalverdijk, Lolkje T.W. de Jong-van den Berg, Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg, Ruud B. Minderaa, Hilde Tobi.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.
2006,
16(4): 432-440.
doi:10.1089/cap.2006.16.432.
Adrianne Faber, Pharm.D.Department of Social Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, Groningen, The Netherlands. SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands. Luuk J. Kalverdijk, M.D.University Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands. Lolkje T.W. de Jong-van den Berg, Ph.D.Department of Social Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, Groningen, The Netherlands. Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg, Ph.D.Department of Medical Pharmacology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam. Ruud B. Minderaa, Ph.D.University Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands. Hilde Tobi, Ph.D.Department of Social Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, Groningen, The Netherlands. Wageningen University Research, Social Sciences Research Methodology Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe current practices around initiation and follow-up care of stimulant treatment among stimulant-treated children in a nationwide survey among parents. Methods: A total of 115 pharmacies detected current stimulant users <16 years old in their pharmacy information system and sent parents a questionnaire regarding their child's stimulant treatment. Results: Parents returned 924 of 1,307 questionnaires (71%). The median age of the stimulant users was 10 years and 85% were boys. In all, 91% were diagnosed with attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In 77% of the cases, the child or parents received other therapies besides stimulants—21% received psychotropic co-medication, with melatonin (11%) and antipsychotics (7%) being mentioned most frequently. Stimulant use was primarily initiated by child psychiatrists (51%) and pediatricians (32%), but most children received repeat prescriptions from general practitioners (61%). Of these 924 children, 19% did not receive any follow-up care, and transfer of prescribing responsibility increased the risk of not receiving follow-up care. The 732 children (79%) who were monitored visited a physician approximately twice a year. During follow-up visits, pediatricians performed physical check ups significantly more often. Conclusion: Stimulant treatment in The Netherlands is initiated mainly by specialists such as child psychiatrists and pediatricians. In the current study, follow-up care for stimulant-treated children in The Netherlands appeared to be poor, suggesting an urgent need for improvement.  This paper was cited by:Current issues around the pharmacotherapy of ADHD in children and adults Willemijn M. Meijer, Adrianne Faber, Els den Ban, Hilde Tobi Pharmacy World & Science. Jul 2009 CrossRef Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review S M Berman, R Kuczenski, J T McCracken, E D London Molecular Psychiatry. Mar 2009, Vol. 14, No. 2: 123-142 CrossRef Prevalence and patterns of methylphenidate use in French children and adolescents Anne-Laure Knellwolf, Jean Deligne, Flavia Chiarotti, Guy-Robert Auleley, Serena Palmieri, Claudine Blum Boisgard, Pietro Panei, Elisabeth Autret-Leca European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Apr 2008, Vol. 64, No. 3: 311-317 CrossRef Long-Acting Methylphenidate-OROS in Youths with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Suboptimally??Controlled with Immediate-Release Methylphenidate Adrianne Faber, Michel van Agthoven, Luuk J Kalverdijk, Hilde Tobi, Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg, Lieven Annemans, Maarten J Postma CNS Drugs. Feb 2008, Vol. 22, No. 2: 157-170 CrossRef
|
|