|
Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals
A Phase I Trial of 90Y-DOTA-Anti-CEA Chimeric T84.66 (cT84.66) Radioimmunotherapy in Patients with Metastatic CEA-Producing Malignancies
To cite this article:
Jeffrey Y.C. Wong, David Z. Chu, Lawrence E. Williams, An Liu, Jiping Zhan, Dave M. Yamauchi, Sharon Wilczynski, Anna M. Wu, Paul J. Yazaki, John E. Shively, Lucille Leong, Andrew A. Raubitschek.
Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals.
April 2006,
21(2): 88-100.
doi:10.1089/cbr.2006.21.88.
Jeffrey Y.C. Wong Division of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Research, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. David Z. Chu Division of I Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Lawrence E. Williams Division of Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. An Liu Division of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Research, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Division of Radioimmunotherapy, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Jiping Zhan Division of Radioimmunotherapy, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Dave M. Yamauchi Division of Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Sharon Wilczynski Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Anna M. Wu Division of Molecular Biology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Currently at Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. Paul J. Yazaki Division of Molecular Biology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. John E. Shively Division of Immunology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Lucille Leong Division of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Andrew A. Raubitschek Division of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Research, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Division of Radioimmunotherapy, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Purpose/Objective: Previous radioimmunotherapy (RIT) clinical trials at this institution with 90Y-labeled cT84.66 anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) evaluated the antibody conjugated to diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). The aim of this phase I therapy trial was to evaluate cT84.66 conjugated to the macrocyclic chelate 90Y-DOTA and labeled with 90Y in a comparable patient population. Experimental Design: Patients with metastatic CEA-producing cancers were entered in this trial. If antibody targeting to tumor was observed after the administration of 111In-DTPA cT84.66, the patient then received the therapy infusion of 90Y-DOTA-cT84.66 1 week later. Serial nuclear scans, blood and urine collections, and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to assess antibody biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and antitumor effects. Results: Thirteen (13) patients were treated in this study. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was experienced at initial starting activity levels of 12 and 8 mCi/m2. Subsequent patients received systemic Ca-DTPA at 125 mg/m2 every 12 hours for 3 days post-therapy to allow for a dose escalation to 16 mCi/m2, where hematologic toxicity was observed with an associated maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 13.4 mCi/m2. Tumor doses ranged from 4.4 to 569 cGy/mCi, which translated to 97–12,500 cGy after a single infusion of 90Y-DOTA-cT84.66. Human antichimeric antibody (HACA) response developed in 8 of 13 patients and prevented additional therapy in 4 patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using 90Y-DOTA-cT84.66 for antibody-guided radiation therapy. Immunogenicity of the DOTA-conjugated cT84.66 antibody was not appreciably greater than that observed with 90Y-DTPA-cT84.66 in previous trials. Dose-limiting hematopoietic toxicity with 90Y-DOTA-cT84.66 decreased with Ca-DTPA infusions post-therapy and appears to be comparable to previously published results for 90Y-DTPA-cT84.66. The highest antibody uptake and tumor doses were to small nodal lesions, which supports the predictions from preclinical and clinical data that RIT may be best applied in the minimal tumor burden setting.  This paper was cited by:Operative probe scintimetry with indium and technetium for colorectal cancer Joseph A. Kuhn, Joshua Nochumson Journal of Surgical Oncology. Oct 2007, Vol. 96, No. 4: 290-296 CrossRef Preparation, Characterization, and Biological Evaluation of a Streptavidin-Chimeric T84.66 Conjugate for Antibody Pretargeting Fang Jia, Tiffani D. Shelton, Michael R. Lewis Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals. Oct 2007, Vol. 22, No. 5: 654-664 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
|
|