Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
DNA Vaccines 2010
Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Vandetanib Plus Docetaxel/Prednisolone in Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

To cite this article:
József Horti, Anders Widmark, Arnulf Stenzl, Miriam H. Federico, Raymond P. Abratt, Nick Sanders, Gillian M. Pover, István Bodrogi. Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals. April 2009, 24(2): 175-180. doi:10.1089/cbr.2008.0588.

Published in Volume: 24 Issue 2: May 2, 2009

Full Text: • PDF for printing (12,411.6 KB) • PDF w/ links (205.6 KB)


József Horti,1
Anders Widmark,2
Arnulf Stenzl,3
Miriam H. Federico,4
Raymond P. Abratt,5
Nick Sanders,6
Gillian M. Pover,7 and
István Bodrogi1
1National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
2Umea University Hospital, Umea, Sweden.
3University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
4Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
5New Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
6AstraZeneca, Loughborough, UK.
7AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Address correspondence to: József Horti;
National Institute of Oncology, Rath Gyorgy u. 7–9
H-1122 Budapest,
Hungary;
Tel.: (36 1) 224-8611; Fax: (36 1) 224-8620

E-mail:

Abstract

Vandetanib (ZACTIMA) is a once-daily oral anticancer drug that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and rearranged during transfection signaling. This randomized (1:1), double-blind study evaluated vandetanib (100mg/day) or placebo in combination with docetaxel (D; 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and prednisolone (P; 2×5mg/day) in 86 patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (mHRPC). The primary assessment was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (confirmed reduction of ≥50% from baseline) and a greater number of patients showed a PSA response with placebo+DP (67%) versus vandetanib+DP (40%); hazard ratio=2.23 (one-sided 80% confidence limit=2.90; one-sided p=0.99). More patients experienced progression events (disease progression or death from any cause) with vandetanib+DP (65%) versus placebo+DP (60%); hazard ratio=1.13 (one-sided 80% confidence limit=1.44; one-sided p=0.67). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, although more patients experienced adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation with vandetanib+DP (28%) versus placebo+DP (12%). However, the safety and tolerability profile for vandetanib was similar to that previously reported; adverse events that occurred more frequently in the vandetanib+DP arm were hypertension (14% vs. 2%), erythematous rash (14% vs. 2%), and exfoliative rash (12% vs. 2%). In this study of patients with mHRPC, vandetanib+DP did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit, compared with placebo+DP.

Free first page
All articles
Previous Next