Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
Journal of Aerosol Medicine
Comparison of SPECT Aerosol Deposition Data with a Human Respiratory Tract Model

To cite this article:
John S. Fleming, Ben P. Epps, Joy H. Conway, Ted B. Martonen. Journal of Aerosol Medicine. Fall 2006, 19(3): 268-278. doi:10.1089/jam.2006.19.268.

Full Text: • PDF for printing (618.5 KB) • PDF w/ links (370.5 KB)


John S. Fleming, Ph.D.
Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ben P. Epps, M.Sc.
Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Joy H. Conway, Ph.D.
School of Health Professions and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ted B. Martonen, Ph.D.
Experimental Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, and Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Three-dimensional (3D) radionuclide imaging provides detailed information on the distribution of inhaled aerosol material within the body. Analysis of the data can provide estimates of the deposition per airway generation. In this study, two different nebulizers have been used to deliver radiolabeled aerosols of different particle size to 12 human subjects. Medical imaging has been used to assess the deposition in the body. The deposition pattern has also been estimated using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) empirical model and compared to values obtained by experiment. The results showed generally good agreement between model and experiment for both aerosols for the deposition in the extrathoracic and conducting airways. However, there were significant differences in the fate of the remainder of the aerosol between the amount deposited in the alveolar region and that exhaled. The inter-subject variability of deposition predicted by the model was significantly less than that measured, for all regions of the body. The model predicted quite well the differences in deposition distribution pattern between the two aerosols. In conclusion, this study has shown that the ICPR model of inhaled aerosol deposition shows areas of good agreement with results from experiment. However, there are also areas of disagreement, which may be explained by hygroscopic particle growth and individual variation in airway anatomy.

Free first page

This paper was cited by:

Air Humidity May Influence the Aerosol Distribution of Normal Saline Administered by Closed or Vented Nebulizers Operated Continuously or Dosimetrically
Malgorzata Krajnik, Zygmunt Podolec, Zbigniew Zylicz, Ewa Jassem
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Mar 2009, Vol. 22, No. 1: 29-34
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
Deposition-Dependent Normal Ranges for Radioaerosol Assessment of Lung Mucus Clearance
John E. Agnew, Amir Hasani
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Dec 2008, Vol. 21, No. 4: 371-380
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
Recent Advances in Predictive Understanding of Respiratory Tract Deposition
Warren H. Finlay, Andrew R. Martin
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Jun 2008, Vol. 21, No. 2: 189-206
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
Recent Advances in Predictive Understanding of Respiratory Tract Deposition
Warren H. Finlay, Andrew R. Martin
Journal of Aerosol Medicine. Mar 2008, Vol. 0, No. 0: 080225123426385-18
CrossRef
Comparison of SPECT Aerosol Deposition Data with Twenty-Four-Hour Clearance Measurements
John S. Fleming, Matthew Quint, Livia Bolt, Ted B. Martonen, Joy H. Conway
Journal of Aerosol Medicine. Sep 2006, Vol. 19, No. 3: 261-267
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
All articles
Previous Next