Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Brimonidine and Timolol Fixed-Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy: A 3-Month Randomized Trial in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

To cite this paper:
E. Randy Craven, Thomas R. Walters, Robert Williams, Connie Chou, Janet K. Cheetham, Rhett Schiffman. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. August 1, 2005, 21(4): 337-348. doi:10.1089/jop.2005.21.337.

Full Text PDF: • HiRes for printing (110.3 KB) • PDF Plus w/ links (163 KB)


E. Randy Craven
Glaucoma Consultants of Colorado, Littleton, CO.
Thomas R. Walters
Keystone Research, Austin, TX.
Robert Williams
Taustine Eye Center, Louisville, KY.
Connie Chou
Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA.
Janet K. Cheetham
Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA.
Rhett Schiffman
Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA.
Combigan Study Group

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)- lowering efficacy of a fixed combination of brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5% (fixed brimonidine/ timolol) versus each drug used as monotherapy.

Methods: Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive fixed brimonidine/timolol BID (n = 385), brimonidine 0.2% TID (n = 382), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 392) in a multicenter, double-masked study. The primary outcome measure was decrease from baseline IOP.

Results: Over all follow-up measurements, the mean decrease from baseline IOP ranged from 4.9 to 7.6 mmHg with brimonidine/timolol, from 3.1 to 5.5 mmHg with brimonidine, and from 4.3 to 6.2 mmHg with timolol. Mean IOP reductions from baseline were significantly larger with fixed brimonidine/timolol than with timolol at all follow-up measurements (P ≤ 0.026); the difference was greater than 1.5 mmHg at 10 AM (peak effect for each treatment). Mean IOP reductions from baseline were significantly larger with fixed brimonidine/ timolol than with brimonidine at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 3 PM (P < 0.001); the difference was greater than 1.5 mmHg. The rate of discontinuations owing to adverse events was 3.6% in the fixed timolol/brimonidine group.

Conclusions: The fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol was well-tolerated and provided significantly better IOP control compared with either brimonidine or timolol used alone.

Free first page

This paper was cited by:

Medical Management of Glaucoma
Casey C. Geringer, Nauman R. Imami
International Ophthalmology Clinics. Dec 2009, Vol. 48, No. 4: 115-141
CrossRef
Twenty-four-hour efficacy of the brimonidine/timolol fixed combination versus therapy with the unfixed components
A G P Konstas, I E Katsimpris, K Kaltsos, I Georgiadou, A Kordelou, L A Nelson, W C Stewart
Eye. Dec 2008, Vol. 22, No. 11: 1391-1397
CrossRef
Efficacy, safety, and current applications of brimonidine
Scott J Fudemberg, Corey Batiste, L Jay Katz
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. Dec 2008, Vol. 7, No. 6: 795-799
CrossRef
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing timolol with brimonidine in the treatment of glaucoma
Seng Chee Loon, Gerald Liew, Adrian Fung, Sharon E Reid, Jonathan C Craig
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. May 2008, Vol. 36, No. 3: 281-289
CrossRef
Ocular Comfort of Combination Glaucoma Therapies: Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Compared with Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5%
Kenny Chan, Madalena Testa, Peter McCluskey
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Aug 2007, Vol. 23, No. 4: 372-376
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
Topical fixed combination brimonidine–timolol therapy for glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Hector J Villarrubia, Robert M Feldman
Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2007, Vol. 2, No. 5: 705
CrossRef
Brimonidine in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Louis B Cantor
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2006, Vol. 2, No. 4: 337
CrossRef
Topical Drug Therapy in Glaucoma
Hemma Resch, Gerhard Garhofer
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2006, Vol. 156, No. 17-18: 501
CrossRef
All papers
Previous Next