|
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Brimonidine and Timolol Fixed-Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy: A 3-Month Randomized Trial in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
To cite this paper:
E. Randy Craven, Thomas R. Walters, Robert Williams, Connie Chou, Janet K. Cheetham, Rhett Schiffman.
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
August 1, 2005,
21(4): 337-348.
doi:10.1089/jop.2005.21.337.
E. Randy Craven Glaucoma Consultants of Colorado, Littleton, CO. Thomas R. Walters Keystone Research, Austin, TX. Robert Williams Taustine Eye Center, Louisville, KY. Connie Chou Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA. Janet K. Cheetham Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA. Rhett Schiffman Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA. Combigan Study Group Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)- lowering efficacy of a fixed combination of brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5% (fixed brimonidine/ timolol) versus each drug used as monotherapy. Methods: Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to receive fixed brimonidine/timolol BID (n = 385), brimonidine 0.2% TID (n = 382), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 392) in a multicenter, double-masked study. The primary outcome measure was decrease from baseline IOP. Results: Over all follow-up measurements, the mean decrease from baseline IOP ranged from 4.9 to 7.6 mmHg with brimonidine/timolol, from 3.1 to 5.5 mmHg with brimonidine, and from 4.3 to 6.2 mmHg with timolol. Mean IOP reductions from baseline were significantly larger with fixed brimonidine/timolol than with timolol at all follow-up measurements (P ≤ 0.026); the difference was greater than 1.5 mmHg at 10 AM (peak effect for each treatment). Mean IOP reductions from baseline were significantly larger with fixed brimonidine/ timolol than with brimonidine at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 3 PM (P < 0.001); the difference was greater than 1.5 mmHg. The rate of discontinuations owing to adverse events was 3.6% in the fixed timolol/brimonidine group. Conclusions: The fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol was well-tolerated and provided significantly better IOP control compared with either brimonidine or timolol used alone.  This paper was cited by:Medical Management of Glaucoma Casey C. Geringer, Nauman R. Imami International Ophthalmology Clinics. Dec 2009, Vol. 48, No. 4: 115-141 CrossRef Twenty-four-hour efficacy of the brimonidine/timolol fixed combination versus therapy with the unfixed components A G P Konstas, I E Katsimpris, K Kaltsos, I Georgiadou, A Kordelou, L A Nelson, W C Stewart Eye. Dec 2008, Vol. 22, No. 11: 1391-1397 CrossRef Efficacy, safety, and current applications of brimonidine Scott J Fudemberg, Corey Batiste, L Jay Katz Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. Dec 2008, Vol. 7, No. 6: 795-799 CrossRef Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing timolol with brimonidine in the treatment of glaucoma Seng Chee Loon, Gerald Liew, Adrian Fung, Sharon E Reid, Jonathan C Craig Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. May 2008, Vol. 36, No. 3: 281-289 CrossRef Ocular Comfort of Combination Glaucoma Therapies: Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Compared with Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5% Kenny Chan, Madalena Testa, Peter McCluskey Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Aug 2007, Vol. 23, No. 4: 372-376 Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & PermissionsTopical fixed combination brimonidine–timolol therapy for glaucoma and ocular hypertension Hector J Villarrubia, Robert M Feldman Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2007, Vol. 2, No. 5: 705 CrossRef Brimonidine in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension Louis B Cantor Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2006, Vol. 2, No. 4: 337 CrossRef Topical Drug Therapy in Glaucoma Hemma Resch, Gerhard Garhofer Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2006, Vol. 156, No. 17-18: 501 CrossRef
|
|