Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
Journal of Neurotrauma
Clinical Elements that Predict Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Multicenter Recursive Partitioning (Decision-Tree) Analysis

To cite this article:
Allen W. Brown, James F. Malec, Robyn L. McClelland, Nancy N. Diehl, Jeffrey Englander, David X. Cifu. Journal of Neurotrauma. October 2005, 22(10): 1040-1051. doi:10.1089/neu.2005.22.1040.

Full Text: • PDF for printing (112.8 KB) • PDF w/ links (163.8 KB)


Allen W. Brown, M.D.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
James F. Malec
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robyn L. McClelland
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nancy N. Diehl
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jeffrey Englander
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, and Department of Functional Restoration, Stanford University School of Medicine, San Jose, California.
David X. Cifu
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often presents clinicians with a complex combination of clinical elements that can confound treatment and make outcome prediction challenging. Predictive models have commonly used acute physiological variables and gross clinical measures to predict mortality and basic outcome endpoints. The primary goal of this study was to consider all clinical elements available concerning a survivor of TBI admitted for inpatient rehabilitation, and identify those factors that predict disability, need for supervision, and productive activity one year after injury. The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) database was used for decision tree analysis using recursive partitioning (n = 3463). Outcome measures included the Functional Independence Measure, the Disability Rating Scale, the Supervision Rating Scale, and a measure of productive activity. Predictor variables included all physical examination elements, measures of injury severity (initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, duration of post-traumatic amnesia [PTA], length of coma, CT scan pathology), gender, age, and years of education. The duration of PTA, age, and most elements of the physical examination were predictive of early disability. The duration of PTA alone was selected to predict late disability and independent living. The duration of PTA, age, sitting balance, and limb strength were selected to predict productive activity at 1 year. The duration of PTA was the best predictor of outcome selected in this model for all endpoints and elements of the physical examination provided additional predictive value. Valid and reliable measures of PTA and physical impairment after TBI are important for accurate outcome prediction.

Free first page

This paper was cited by:

Traumatic Brain Injury
Christian M. Niedzwecki, Jennifer H. Marwitz, Jessica M. Ketchum, David X. Cifu, Charles M. Dillard, Eugenio A. Monasterio
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. Aug 2008, Vol. 23, No. 4: 209-219
CrossRef
Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status
JENNIE PONSFORD, KRISTY DRAPER, MICHAEL SCHÖNBERGER
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. Apr 2008, Vol. 14, No. 02
CrossRef
The Effect of Premorbid Demographic Factors on the Recovery of Neurocognitive Function in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
Ik-Chan Jeon, Oh-Lyong Kim, Min-Su Kim, Seong-Ho Kim, Chul-Hoon Chang, Dai-Seg Bai
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. Feb 2008, Vol. 44, No. 5: 295
CrossRef
The Effects of Increasing Stimulus Complexity in Event-Related Potentials and Reaction Time Testing: Clinical Applications in Evaluating Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
Henry L. Lew, Darryl Thomander, Max Gray, John H. Poole
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. Nov 2007, Vol. 24, No. 5: 398-404
CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Early Prognostic Factors for Return to Work After Traumatic Brain Injury
Elizabeth J Nightingale, Cheryl A Soo, Robyn L Tate
Brain Impairment. Oct 2007, Vol. 8, No. 2: 101-142
CrossRef
The Mayo Classification System for Traumatic Brain Injury Severity
James F. Malec, Allen W. Brown, Cynthia L. Leibson, Julie Testa Flaada, Jayawant N. Mandrekar, Nancy N. Diehl, Patricia K. Perkins
Journal of Neurotrauma. Sep 2007, Vol. 24, No. 9: 1417-1424
Abstract | Full Text PDF | Reprints & Permissions
Self-assessment of Impairment, Impaired Self-awareness, and Depression After Traumatic Brain Injury
James F. Malec, Julie A. Testa, Beth K. Rush, Allen W. Brown, Anne M. Moessner
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. Jun 2007, Vol. 22, No. 3: 156-166
CrossRef
Day-of-Injury Computerized Tomography, Rehabilitation Status, and Development of Cerebral Atrophy in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury
Erin D. Bigler, David K. Ryser, Partha Gandhi, Jordan Kimball, Elisabeth A. Wilde
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. Nov 2006, Vol. 85, No. 10: 793-806
CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Evoked and Event-related Potentials in Moderate to Severe Brain Injury
Henry L. Lew, John H. Poole, Annabel Castaneda, Rose Marie Salerno, Max Gray
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. Aug 2006, Vol. 21, No. 4: 350-360
CrossRef
The Accuracy of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Long-term Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury
Mary E. Segal, Philip H. Goodman, Richard Goldstein, Walter Hauck, John Whyte, John W. Graham, Marcia Polansky, Flora M. Hammond
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. Aug 2006, Vol. 21, No. 4: 298-314
CrossRef
The Use of Serum Biomarkers to Predict Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults and Children
Rachel Pardes Berger
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. Aug 2006, Vol. 21, No. 4: 315-333
CrossRef
All articles
Previous Next