Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
Photomedicine and Laser Surgery
A Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Phototherapy in Tissue Repair

To cite this article:
Andras M. Fulop, Seema Dhimmer, James R. Deluca, David D. Johanson, Richard V. Lenz, Keyuri B. Patel, Peter C. Douris, Chukuka S. Enwemeka. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. October 2009, 27(5): 695-702. doi:10.1089/pho.2009.2550.

Published in Volume: 27 Issue 5: November 1, 2009
Online Ahead of Print: August 21, 2009

Full Text: • HTML • PDF for printing (112.7 KB) • PDF w/ links (196.4 KB)


Andras M. Fulop, D.P.T.,
Seema Dhimmer, D.P.T.,
James R. Deluca, D.P.T.,
David D. Johanson, D.P.T.,
Richard V. Lenz, D.P.T.,
Keyuri B. Patel, D.P.T.,
Peter C. Douris, D.P.T., Ed.D., and
Chukuka S. Enwemeka, Ph.D., FACSM
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, New York.
Address correspondence to:

Chukuka S. Enwemeka, Ph.D., FACSM

College of Health Sciences

University of Wisconsin-Milwavkee
Enderis Hall, Suite 898

2400 E. Hartford Avenue

Milwavkee, WI 53201-0413

E-mail:

Abstract

Objective: The effect of phototherapy on tissue repair was determined by aggregating the literature and using statistical meta-analysis to analyze pertinent studies published between 2000 and 2007. Background Data: Phototherapy has been used for more than 40 y; however, its efficacy on tissue repair remains contentious. Method: Related original studies were gathered from every available source. The papers were then screened and coded; those meeting pre-established inclusion criterion were subjected to meta-analysis, using Cohen's d statistic to determine treatment effect size. Results: Seventy effect sizes were computed from the 23 papers that met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean effect obtained was highly significant, d=+1.94 (95% confidence interval=0.58–2.50). Further analyses revealed a similarly positive effect of phototherapy on tissue repair in experimental animal studies, d=+2.60, and a small to moderately positive effect in human cases of tissue repair, d=+0.34. The fail-safe number associated with the overall effect was 869; i.e., the number of additional studies in which phototherapy has negative or no effect on wound healing needed to negate the overall large effect size of+1.94. The corresponding fail-safe numbers for experimental animal and human tissue repair studies were 612 and 64, respectively. Conclusion: These findings indicate that phototherapy is a highly effective form of treatment for tissue repair, with stronger supporting evidence resulting from experimental animal studies than human studies.

Free first page

This paper was cited by:

Advances and Perspectives on Tissue Repair and Healing
Antonio L.B. Pinheiro
Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. Dec 2009, Vol. 27, No. 6: 833-836
First Page | Full Text PDF or HTML | Reprints & Permissions
All articles
Previous Next