|
Tissue Engineering
Review: Gene- and Stem Cell–Based Therapeutics for Bone Regeneration and Repair
To cite this article:
Nadav Kimelman, Gadi Pelled, Gregory A. Helm, J. Huard, Edward M. Schwarz, Dan Gazit.
Tissue Engineering.
June 2007,
13(6): 1135-1150.
doi:10.1089/ten.2007.0096.
Nadav Kimelman Skeletal Biotech Lab, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem–Hadassah Medical Campus, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. Gadi Pelled Skeletal Biotech Lab, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem–Hadassah Medical Campus, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. Gregory A. Helm Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. J. Huard Growth and Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Edward M. Schwarz The Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. Dan Gazit Skeletal Biotech Lab, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem–Hadassah Medical Campus, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel. Stem Cell Therapeutics Research, Department of Surgery and International Stem Cell Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Many clinical conditions require regeneration or implantation of bone. This is one focus shared by neurosurgery and orthopedics. Current therapeutic options (bone grafting and protein-based therapy) do not provide satisfying solutions to the problem of massive bone defects. In the past few years, gene- and stem cell–based therapy has been extensively studied to achieve a viable alternative to current solutions offered by modern medicine for bone-loss repair. The use of adult stem cells for bone regeneration has gained much focus. This unique population of multipotential cells has been isolated from various sources, including bone marrow, adipose, and muscle tissues. Genetic engineering of adult stem cells with potent osteogenic genes has led to fracture repair and rapid bone formation in vivo. It is hypothesized that these genetically modified cells exert both an autocrine and a paracrine effects on host stem cells, leading to an enhanced osteogenic effect. The use of direct gene delivery has also shown much promise for in vivo bone repair. Several viral and nonviral methods have been used to achieve substantial bone tissue formation in various sites in animal models. To advance these platforms to the clinical setting, it will be mandatory to overcome specific hurdles, such as control over transgene expression, viral vector toxicity, and prolonged culture periods of therapeutic stem cells. This review covers a prospect of cell and gene therapy for bone repair as well as some very recent advancements in stem cell isolation, genetic engineering, and exogenous control of transgene expression.  This paper was cited by:Comparison of Osteogenic Potentials of BMP4 Transduced Stem Cells from Autologous Bone Marrow and Fat Tissue in a Rabbit Model of Calvarial Defects Lin Lin, Qi Shen, Xuelei Wei, Yu Hou, Tao Xue, Xin Fu, Xiaoning Duan, Changlong Yu Calcified Tissue International. Jun 2009 CrossRef Proteomics: New insights into rheumatic diseases Emilio Camafeita, José Ramón Lamas, Enrique Calvo, Juan Antonio López, Benjamín Fernández-Gutiérrez PROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS. Mar 2009, Vol. 3, No. 2: 226-241 CrossRef Micro-electroporation of mesenchymal stem cells with alternating electrical current pulses Roee Ziv, Yair Steinhardt, Gadi Pelled, Dan Gazit, Boris Rubinsky Biomedical Microdevices. Mar 2009, Vol. 11, No. 1: 95-101 CrossRef Semi-Synthetic Ecdysteroids as Gene-Switch Actuators: Synthesis, Structure-Activity Relationships, and Prospective ADME Properties Silvia Lapenna, Laurence Dinan, Jennifer Friz, Anton  J. Hopfinger, Jianzhong Liu, Robert  E. Hormann ChemMedChem. Feb 2009, Vol. 4, No. 1: 55-68 CrossRef Osteogenic potential of reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) aspirate collected from patients undergoing hip arthroplasty Ryan M. Porter, Fangjun Liu, Carmencita Pilapil, Oliver B. Betz, Mark S. Vrahas, Mitchel B. Harris, Christopher H. Evans Journal of Orthopaedic Research. Feb 2009, Vol. 27, No. 1: 42-49 CrossRef Emerging Technologies and Fourth Generation Issues in Cartilage Repair Michael W. Kessler, George Ackerman, Joshua S. Dines, Daniel Grande Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. Jan 2009, Vol. 16, No. 4: 246-254 CrossRef MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL AND GENE THERAPIES FOR SPINAL FUSION Oren N. Gottfried, Andrew T. Dailey Neurosurgery. Oct 2008, Vol. 63, No. 3: 380-392 CrossRef Evidence of in vivo osteoinduction in adult rat bone by adeno-Runx2 intra-femoral delivery Bheem M. Bhat, John A. Robinson, Valerie E. Coleburn, Weiguang Zhao, Yogendra Kharode Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. May 2008, Vol. 103, No. 6: 1912-1924 CrossRef Nonvirally Engineered Porcine Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells: Use in Posterior Spinal Fusion Dima Sheyn, Gadi Pelled, Yoram Zilberman, Farahnaz Talasazan, Jonathan M. Frank, Dan Gazit, Zulma Gazit Stem Cells. May 2008, Vol. 26, No. 4: 1056-1064 CrossRef Cell therapy for bone regeneration-Bench to bedside Kevin Lee, Casey K. Chan, Nilesh Patil, Stuart B. Goodman Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. Feb 2008, Vol. 9999B: NA-NA CrossRef
|
|