Hello. Sign in to personalize your visit. New user? Register now.  
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Entomological Factors Affecting the Low Endemicity of Chagas Disease in Nazca, Southwestern Peru

To cite this article:
Claudia Paredes-Esquivel, Emilio Lecaros, Mauro Aguliar-Rosales, Hilda Solis Acosta, Pedro Castellanos. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. -Not available-, ahead of print. doi:10.1089/vbz.2009.0015.

Online Ahead of Print: October 29, 2009

Full Text: • HTML • PDF for printing (20,662.3 KB) • PDF w/ links (195.1 KB)


Claudia Paredes-Esquivel,1,*

*Present address: Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Emilio Lecaros,1
Mauro Aguliar-Rosales,1
Hilda Solis Acosta,2 and
Pedro Castellanos1
1Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
2Instituto de Medicina Tropical Daniel Alcides Carrión, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Address correspondence to:

Claudia Paredes-Esquivel

Department of Biología

Universitat de les Illes Balears
Palma de Mallorca

Illes Balears 07122

Spain
E-mail:

Abstract

Chagas disease is prevalent in Peru. The province of Nazca, in the southwestern region of the country, shows a high intradomiciliary infestation rate of Triatoma infestans bugs. Although the vector is present, the number of Chagas disease cases appears to be much lower than those reported in the neighboring region of Arequipa. We examined 624 T. infestans from Nazca to determine the current Trypanosoma cruzi infection rates, and found that no bugs were infected with this parasite. These results contrast with those found in Arequipa, where 19–30% triatomines have been reported infected. To compare their vectorial capacity, we infected 30 T. infestans specimens, selected both from Nazca and Arequipa, by feeding bugs on T. cruzi–infected mice. The parasites developed all stages expected in the vector; furthermore, the infective stage, metacyclic trypomastigote, was found in both insect populations from the second week after infection. In addition, those insects that accepted to be fed with mice blood defecated immediately after finishing blood meal, indicating that they might be efficient vectors. We maintain that differences observed in infection rates between vectors from Nazca and Arequipa may be explained by differences in host availability. In Arequipa hosts are mainly small animals, whereas in Nazca the main blood source comes from birds, which are refractory to the infection.

Free first page
All articles
Previous Next