|
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Vector Competence of Australian Mosquitoes for Chikungunya Virus
To cite this article:
Andrew F. van den Hurk, Sonja Hall-Mendelin, Alyssa T. Pyke, Greg A. Smith, John S. Mackenzie.
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases.
-Not available-,
ahead of print.
doi:10.1089/vbz.2009.0106.
Online Ahead of Print: October 30, 2009
Andrew F. van den Hurk,1,2 Sonja Hall-Mendelin,2 Alyssa T. Pyke,1 Greg A. Smith,1 and John S. Mackenzie3 1Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia. 2School of Chemical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia. 3Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for Emerging Infectious Disease, Centre for International Health, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Address correspondence to: Andrew F. van den Hurk Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services Queensland HealthP.O. Box 594 Archerfield 4108 Queensland AustraliaE-mail: Abstract Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a globally emerging arbovirus responsible for unprecedented outbreaks in the western Indian Ocean, the Indian subcontinent and Italy. To assess the receptivity of Australia to CHIKV, we exposed 10 Australian mosquito species to a 2006 strain of CHIKV isolated from a viremic traveler from Mauritius. In susceptibility trials, the infectious dose required to infect 50% of the mosquitoes was 100.6 cell culture infectious dose (CCID)50/mosquito for Aedes procax, 101.7 CCID50/mosquito for Aedes albopictus, 102.1 CCID50/mosquito for Aedes vigilax, and 102.6 CCID50/mosquito for Aedes aegypti and Aedes notoscriptus. When exposed to blood meals containing between 103.5 and 104.1 CCID50/mosquito of CHIKV, infection rates in these five species, plus Coquillettidia linealis, were ≥81%. Subsequent transmission rates ranged between 20% for Ae. notoscriptus and 76% for Ae. vigilax. In contrast, Culex spp. were poor laboratory vectors, with infection and dissemination rates ≤20% and ≤12%, respectively. Although Australia has efficient laboratory vectors, the role a mosquito species plays in potential CHIKV transmission cycles will also depend on its geographical and temporal abundance, longevity, and association with humans. 
|
|